Previous Page

Saturday, June 5
WHICH CAME FIRST....THE CHICKEN? OR THE EGG?

Yet again, i have changed the background of my blog. No surprise, eh?

Well...let me see...Nope. Nothing good has been happening in my life lately. Nothing worth writing down, so what am i going to write about instead? Who knows. Lets just see what comes out
.


WHICH CAME FIRST....THE CHICKEN? OR THE EGG?
Lan's Theroy:

In nature, living things evolve  through changes in their DNA. In an animal like a chicken, DNA from a male sperm cell and a female ovum meet and combine to form a zygote -- the first cell of a new baby chicken. This first cell divides innumerable times to form all of the cells of the complete animal. In any animal, every cell contains exactly the same DNA, and that DNA comes from the zygote.

Chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote. These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutation that produced the first true chicken. That one zygote cell divided to produce the first true chicken.

Prior to that first true chicken zygote, there were only non-chickens. The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first.

 



Posted by Lan at Saturday, June 05, 2004
(1) Questioned Reality   





Thursday, May 13
Psychology of Christianity

The Psychology Of Christianity

By Lionel “The Sinister Minister” Moirez

Christianity.  Probably the largest cult claiming it’s a religion due to the sheer amount of followers it has drawn.  Most of who aren’t necessarily the brightest apples in the bunch.  They’re brought up to believe what their parents believe and their parents’ parents believed and so on down the line all the way back to the beginning.  It’s a continuous, unending pattern in human history.  Like a chain that can’t be broken.  I’m tired of hearing about it and it’s time for such a “perfect” thing to be shown as the fraudulent fairytale it really is. Christians:   (Other branches do apply to this as a whole, it would take too damned long to go through each and everyone of them and explain their faults so I’ll do it all at once).  Some are basically scared into believing in Christianity, i.e. if you don’t believe in god; you go to hell and burn for all eternity.  Basically what this means is if you’re not with us you’re against us so you should deserve to die over and over again in the most painful and scary place that we can create.  And some are raised by their parents to believe in Christianity.  Their parents and peers on occasion put images into the youngsters mind that subconsciously tell them that this religion is good and believing in anything else is completely wrong.  And after years and years of saying, “I’m a Christian” or “I’m a catholic” or “I’m a Protestant” people will just do it out of habit. They’ve gotten so used to thinking that’s what they are they actually believe it.  And even when they’re not devout Christians like some fanatics, they will still defend their “faith” to their last breath.  Why?

Peer pressure.  They were raised into believing that it’s wrong to have a free mind and change your opinion.  Like “you’re either this or that, but we’re making you a this and you should never ever be a that.

If you ever go against our will we shall shun you forever, and never respect you.”  People are afraid to

lose their friends because they still want to have their respect and all the benefits of being with the “in” crowd.  Same thing in high school: “You’re either popular or a freak and we will never look at you, let alone give you the time of day.”  Basically those who don’t conform to their mind-bending, overpopulated, idiotic, cult are obviously evil and should be hunted down and murdered as their fictitious and fairy-tale like god commanded them to do.  (Surprisingly their God, loving everyone and everything in the world, able to control a person’s fate in a nanosecond, isn’t able to control free thought and atheists and orders them to be executed for blasphemy by the people he can control).

“Christian: n.  One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor.  One who follows the teachings of Christ in so far as they are not inconsistent with a life of sin.” Ambrose Gwinett Bierce (1842-1914?) The Devil’s Dictionary (1911)

Church:  Good proof of what I’m saying can be witnessed in a church (supposing you don’t burst into

flames like the heathen demons you are upon entering the doors to this omnipresent foundation of greed and self-absorbency).  Observe the “believers” in a church.  Compare the amount of those who actually

participate in the singing with all their might and soul (assuming they aren’t being provoked to by more

peer pressure and fear of being singled out and persecuted for not conforming), I’m sure you’ll see what I mean.  There is a good 10% to 90% ratio between people that are actually interested in this crap and those that go out of habit and/or against their will. Most really don’t care and are just there to go, not to pray for their sins to be washed away or for a disease to be cured.  They go simply to go not to feel holy anymore.  Another thing: look at their eyes, faces, and body expressions.  Do these people look like the stereotypically depicted Christian? Wide-eyed filled with holy inspiration and love for their fellow man and all that pompous bullshit. Hardly.  Bored-as-fuck, wishing-they-were-watching-TV, uninterested zombies.  Count how many will fall asleep or are on the edge of consciousness.  Imagine a world without having to go to a place to be bored for an hour to an hour and a half.  These people actually expect you to shell out a good 20 bucks so the priest can go buy a fancy new car and say that it was a gift from god and he will use it to spread the word of his savior.  They expect you to sing every hymn so loud and clearly that God can hear you.  And so on.  It’s the same procedure every Sunday.  Go, wipe some Evian on your body, try to stay awake, put an Andrew Jackson in the tray when it comes around, eat a mass produced

“blessed” cracker and drink some grape juice, shake hands with total strangers, wipe more Evian on your

body, and leave to go whack off at home to make up for all the time you missed.  Boy sounds like fun, count

me in.

Clergy:  Priests, “fathers”, bishops, cardinals, popes, etc.  If you listen to a priests’ sermon during a middle of a mass you can pick out certain words and phrases that are commonly referred to.  At every church mass I have attended the sermon stays the same in symbolism, just changes in words.  Some topics the

priest will try to debunk are: atheists, agnostics, UFO’s, Homosexuals, abortion, various other religions, spiritualism, possibility of church and state separation, and so on.  Same old shit every Sunday. Basically they run out of topics to convince the masses to believe in the further with so they recycle old ones.   Religion has had nothing new added to it in general for the past few hundred years.  Persecution of anything that doesn’t conform to their beliefs (Spanish Inquisition, The Crusades, Salem Witch Hunt, The Holocaust, and more recently Islam) is all they do apparently.  According to these priests, and so-called “holy men”, God tells Christians to love themselves, each other, and everything else in the universe.  Boy they sure are doing a damned good job of upholding God’s will if their intent is mass genocide and Death. to everything and everyone they come in contact with. Bra-fucking-vo.  Another one of my problems with the clergy of this cult is their incredible greed.  When the priests ask you to place a few bucks into the

basket or plate or whatever, what do you think happens to it?  Does it go to the hungry and needy on the

streets?  Just a small portion of the money, and indirectly given at that.  The money goes to Christian corporations to buy new stationary and make more bulletins about their recent campaigns to stop any

other belief, abortion, etc.  How much money actually goes to the individual who needs it?  Not one red

fuçking cent.  The rest of the money received goes to keeping the priest alive.  Medical bills, electricity, TV, phone bills, groceries, gas money, etc., it's not like the priest gets to live off the government completely.  Believe me it actually costs money to survive in this country and just as a little bonus they aren’t taxed like the rest of us by the US government.  If God loves them so much why doesn’t he get off his big fat ass and pay the bills for them so they can eternally spread the word of God?  Why doesn’t he get up and give them eternal life so they can continue spreading God’s word forever?  Why doesn’t he get up and kill all of us atheists and those who like having our mind free from restriction by others?  And when was the last time we saw a miracle?  What about the apocalypse that was supposed to occur last year but apparently never happened? Christians will claim that God wouldn’t do any of this because of his supreme knowledge and will.  How the fuçk could you know your God’s will just by praying and attending church?  Doesn’t you religion tell you that if you found out the meaning of life and God’s will your mind would collapse because you aren’t able to control that awesome amount of mental power and supreme intelligence?  Horseshit. Closet disbelievers:  They occasionally ask questions in their mind but never dare utter a word about such blasphemy for fear of exclusion and persecution. Sounds very holocaustic.  The Jews were afraid to admit they were Jewish for fear of being persecuted so they kept it to themselves to avoid being slaughtered in front of their families.  Just read the true story about the Einsatz Executions in Poland, you’ll get a good feel for what it was like.  These scare tactics obviously don’t work on atheists.  Why?  Because we, unlike the majority of the world that is uneducated, don’t believe everything we were told and tend to ask questions about things.  Teachers in my high school always tell me to ask questions about a concept if I don’t understand it, and tell me that’s the only way to get smarter.  Apparently that phrase can be applied

to more than just a simple math problem or history exam.  Question everything and believe nothing beyond a shadow of a doubt.  If Christians can prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that every shred of horse shit spewing from that butt hole on their face they call a mouth is true, I will convert.  I challenge you to try to break my will to be different and enjoy thinking freely.  Spanish Inquisition anyone?  None for me thanks.

Common Misconceptions of Atheists:  Listen up, because this part I stress with extreme importance.  Atheists are not demons, we are not the physical manifestation of the antichrist or Satan, and we are definitely not evil.  How many Atheists have you heard about committing mass genocide, murder, or other such global atrocities?  Don’t even for one second call us Nazis because, believe it or not, Nazis are a hate group that still did believe in God.  Proof exists.  Listen to this phrase commonly chanted by nazis: “Kinder, Kirche, Kueche.”, or “Children, Church, and Kitchen”. Nazis used to award Iron Crosses for bravery.  An inscription made on Nazi rings states “Gott mit uns”, or God with us.  The Nazionalsocialisteurbeiterpartei (National Socialist Workers Party), or Nazi’s for short, was not an Atheistic Party. “An ‘Atheist’ is not a ‘what.’ An ‘Atheist’ is aperson who has a lifestyle premised on the

weltanschauung of materialism. That is, we accept ‘objective reality’ in living our lives and we reject any phantasmagoria of the imagination of theistic fold. We live in the real world. Theistic folk live in a world of make believe. To put it simply, an Atheist says to you, ‘What you see is what you get....’ An Atheist uses reason to solve human problems, to make his way in life, to seek happiness, to live with the human community. We eschew the irrational idea of theism” -American Atheists Definition of an Atheist-

 

“Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their lifestyle as follows. An Atheist loves himself and his fellow man instead of a god. An Atheist thinks that heaven is something for which we should work for now -here on earth- for all men together to enjoy. An Atheist accepts that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, subdue and enjoy it. An Atheist thinks that only in knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment. "Therefore, he seeks to know himself and his fellow

man rather than to 'know' a god. An Atheist knows that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An Atheist knows that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said. An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. “He wants disease conquered, poverty vanquished, war eliminated. He wants man to understand and love man. He wants an ethical way of life. He knows that we cannot rely on a god nor channel action into prayer nor hope for an end of troubles in a hereafter. He knows that we are our brothers' keepers in that we are, first, keepers of our lives; that we are responsible persons, that the job is here and the time is now.” -Madalyn Murray O’Hair, 1961-

 

 

Christian Devotion:  Most Christians that I question about their faith aren’t even able to recite their ten

commandments or defend their faith.  Why?  Because they’re only taught a minimal amount, or they’re taught but they just don’t care and therefore forget it all.  It sounds to them that we’re insulting them and they want to come up with something good as a comeback but can only say things like “Shut up” or “You’re so full of shit” or “You’re going to hell” or “God will kill you soon”.  They’re obviously defending their pride, because if their pride is broken then they are broken.  Something that’s very relatable to this occurred often back in the days of slavery in America.  Slaves would bicker between each other about whose master was better, they would lie and make things up to make their masters and owners sound more godlike.  They would argue for hours defending their cruel masters with the same phrases just used over and over again trying to make him look better.  Basically their mentality is this: If my master looks bad then I look worse.  Same thing with Christians: If my religion is wrong, then I’m wrong for believing it and I look like an idiot.  And I think that we all know either from observation or personal experience and insight just how much people hate being proved wrong and will lie and fight to the death defending their ideas and/or beliefs.  Essentially an inferiority and dominance complex.  People are always competing and

striving with each other to be the best at everything and are willing to give everything to prove that they’re right or better or whatever the case may be. It’s occurred for thousands of years and it one of the most basic instincts: Survival of the fittest.  You will have the greatest amount of respect from your peers and you will have the self-pride to know that you have beaten everyone else at even the stupidest things.  Just look at a High school.  Many examples of competition to be witnessed.  Females strive to look better than everyone else in order to be able to say, “I can get any man I wanted”, but rarely ever do. Sports:  Pretty self-explanatory.  You strive to receive the most recognition and praise for physical and occasionally mental achievements on the playing fields or whatever so you can say “I can beat anyone at ‘blah blah blah’”.




Posted by Lan at Thursday, May 13, 2004
(1) Questioned Reality   





Thursday, May 13
Pyschology of Christianity (cont.)

This all goes back to my original theory of the meaning of life: to reproduce. Sexual dominance in the other animal kingdoms is incredibly apparent.  Example:  Gorillas will fight each other for the chance to mate with a female in order to prove their dominance and authority. Similarly with humans, (although most ignorant asshole separatist humans wouldn’t ever dare to associate themselves with “filthy, flea-ridden, beastly” animals just because we have sprouted a brain, although some still don’t even know how to use it) people will fight for sexual dominance in order to show their authority and ability to be the best at everything   Also similar to the Oedipal complex that all people have. The Oedipal complex states that boys will fight each other and their fathers for the love of their mother. They feel that the other is trying to detract attention away from them and of course they want the attention back because it makes them feel good inside.

 

“Freud theorized that there are three parts of the mind: id, ego, and superego. Id is associated with the immediate gratification of unconscious; natural needs and does not take external reality into account. A child may hit his brother out of anger whenever he feels like it. Thus, people must go beyond id to learn to be socially acceptable. This is where the ego comes into play. Ego intervenes between instinctual needs and external reality. For instance, a child's id might want to hit his brother, but ego is willing to put it off until after Mom and Dad are out of the room. Superego is just a more developed ego. It is our conscience--that part of us that knows right from wrong. A child's superego would say that it is wrong to hit the brother and stop the child from doing it.”

http://vccslitonline.cc.va.us/oedipuscomplex/_oedipuscomplex/0000002c.htm

 

Good quick example and jump into the human subconscious.  As you can see from the passage the Id is the warehouse of all the most basic instincts and animalism in each and every one of us.

 

Unfortunately Sigmund Freud decided this was a fault, thus showing my point about people separating themselves from the animals.  Who has created pollution on this planet?  Who has brought upon the mass genocide of species?  Who has been destroying this planet since day one of their existence?  Fuçking humans that’s who.  And what could be more of an arrogant, idiotic, and insulting statement than the fact that you want to separate from your roots just because they act differently or you feel you’re better than them.  It is insulting to those of us who still have connections to the original world to hear people talk about filthy animals and hunting and all the carnage they cause without giving it a second thought. Just watch people going about their lives.  Sit in a public area become relaxed and follow one person at a time with your eyes.  Try to pierce into what they’re thinking just by how they act, you’ll understand what I’m talking about

 

Another thing: since we’re all related to the animals why is it that animals don’t display any need for religion or desire to believe in one? Because they’re fuçking smarter than that and know that they don’t need it and its fuçking stupid that’s why. 

The single most destructive force on this planet is what?  Take some time to think about this one.

Human-fuçking-beings.  People always consider themselves as infallible and always right (see above paragraphs), and can’t stand being proved wrong, so they can never stop to look at the world and see what has happened, admitting that there is a problem with the world.  Even if they do most don’t stop and do anything about it.  Only a select few are able to do this successfully.  Brings me happiness to know I am one of them. That’s what makes an Atheist an Atheist.  They stop and look at the world for what it is and ask themselves and others what they have done and what they can do to change this world for the better.  We separate ourselves from the typical planet killer called man, as though we’re a different race, which we essentially are.  We do things differently than other people and because of this we are considered demons or witches of evil and so on.  An Atheist is rarely able to admit their wrong doings to themselves, unlike most people who use self-deception in order to justify their actions so they can feel better about

themselves.  Self-honesty is the only way to achieve true enlightenment about oneself.  Simply, if you lie to yourself how are you ever going to know who you really are, you’ll only know what others want you to be.  Never be afraid to say what you feel and mean to both yourself and others even if others don’t really want to hear it, you’re still doing your mind a huge favor.  Never be afraid to show that you are afraid or intimidated.  If you cover it up all the time how are you going to be able to understand your fears and be able to overcome them? My feeling is that the practice of spiritualism instead of religion is far more preferable and better for you.  If you base your ideas on those of other people and keep repeating them through the grapevine of time nothing much will ever get accomplished.  Mass spiritualism is by far one of the biggest mistakes in the history of mankind.  Personal spiritualism means more to yourself and helps you get in touch with yourself and become more enlightened.  Thus you will be able to reduce stress in your life considerably and be able to have a much more constructive attitude towards the world.  In general intelligence rates in humans will skyrocket and finally we’ll be able to evolve as a civilization (an interesting side note: why haven’t there been any discoveries of human evolution for the past few thousand years?  Religion bans the theory of evolution that’s why.  They don’t want to admit that evolution happens which would negate their entire faith system.). 

 

 

I like this.

Lionel, mate, you're a legend.




Posted by Lan at Thursday, May 13, 2004
Question Reality   





Monday, March 29
Craig Stevens/Ian Thorpe Controversy

(Surely some of you will have heard about Ian Thorpe falling into the pool and being "disqualified" from the 400m freestyle swimming event.)


The only thing that this whole Thorpe controversy has done is to show the world what greedy, unsupporting fools the nation of Australia can be when it comes to sport. First of all, this controversy only exists because Thorpe fell off the block, and had anyone else done it, we would not have batted an eyelid. What does this say about us other than the only people we choose to support and encourage are the people who are certain of winning us a gold medal? Aren't the Olympic Games trying to teach sportsmanship here? Ian Thorpe broke a rule which he had known for a long time, and he had to face the consequences. OK, he is the best 400m freestyle swimmer in the world, but does that make him more human, or more deserving of the right to swim in that race? And why should Craig Stevens need to even consider giving up a place that he won fair and square? He didn't push Ian off the block, but he might as well have. It's important to note that Thorpe himself claimed he jumped into the pool because he heard a signal. I truly think that this incident has only proved that we as a nation are greedy and unsupporting and we should be ashamed of ourselves. The only people in the right here are Stevens and Thorpe.


This is just great.
Australia has just shown to us how honest they can be. Rules are there for a reason. Here is something to think about. If Craig Stevens had false started would there have been any controversy at all? Ian Thorpe should have never taken the spot either. He made a mistake. Why should Craig Stevens suffer for it? If Ian Thorpe false starts on the big night, there would be something to write about.


Craig, you performed and excelled admirably, and although I love Thorpe, I disapprove of what has taken place. Rules are rules - even when we don't like them. Who was to say if the race was run - you mightn't have won? And even though you have bowed out gracefully (or by pressure) that Thorpe would have been next in line? Thorpe is known to be the best at this race - but who is to say he is the best now? The pressure is now on him to come through with the goods. And goodness helps him if he doesn't win after getting this chance! For me, I've lost my interest in following Australian swimming - it's just like football, all politics and no real interest in the sport itself. Regards, good luck and farewell


The games our country plays are so obvious. So we sneak Thorpe into the event, when he didn't qualify, and we can still say
Australia abides by the rules. What a laughing stock we are now. I'd love to hear Australia's comments if another country had done this. Rules? Rules are only limits for the little guy. When it's deemed important enough by people in positions high enough rules are nothing - they just arrange it so they get the same result. Rest assured that the rest of the world isn't stupid and will notice how we bend the rules to suit ourselves. Man, will I laugh every time Australia points the finger from now on. This has got to be the final ball underarm of swimming. What a fine example of Olympic spirit - win at all costs.

 

What a poor day for Australian sport. We have just had Anzac day and heard a lot about spirit, fair go, and other "Aussie attributes" How come that our hero failed when asked on the day and yet accepts the race place in competition knowing that someone else is more entitled. This is the real world. Others get disappointed and accept. Shame on you Ian Thorpe, for your lack of sportsmanship, and shame on the swimming selectors for not enforcing the rules they judged all the others by. Shame on you all who have participated in this corrupt fraud.

Thorpe gets to swim when he didn't qualify. Craig Stevens qualified yet he doesn't get to race. He suffers for Thorpe's mistake. Can someone explain to me why we even bother having qualifying finals? How do we know for certain that Thorpe would have qualified? Anything could have happened. Thorpe may have gotten off to a slow start and Stevens may have been faster than him on the day! Thorpe may be good, but he is not unbeatable. This is disgusting, and everyone who put pressure on Craig Stevens to step down should be ashamed of themselves. I hope Hackett leaves Thorpe for dead and gets the gold.
 
Well here we go again; there are rules for some and rules for others. It is interesting that no one calls into question the method or procedure for selection of athletes for our representatives until a supposed high flyer makes a mistake. Now suddenly the method of selection is called into question. I really wonder if it had been Dutchman Pieter van den Hoogenband who had been disqualified whether Australian Swimming would have sat back and allowed him to bypass selection and go straight to the Olympics. Not likely. Once again we are going to pander to the corporate business than the true belief of the Olympics. Our thoughts go out to Craig Stevens, who has done the right thing but has been beaten into submission to step down and let Ian Thorpe meet his contract arrangements for his sponsors. It is a shame he cannot accept lose/failure as so many other great athletes have to during their career. Why do we have a selection process if another bunch of bureaucratic bunglers can over turn official results and force an athlete who has rightfully earned his position in the team out?
Ian Thorpe you failed, accept it and move on, Craig you go on and do your best for
Australia. Because that is all we can expect and we should all be behind you

 
Ian Thorpe should not race in the 400m. Stevens has worked hard all his life and here is his chance for his dream to come true. What happens if Stevens swims a world record at
Athens
? No one can tell how he is going to swim. So we should give him a chance. But what if Thorpey was stuck in a car accident and could not make it - they would have to wait for him then. In running they have different rules, In the beginning of the year if you run a spectacular time your in to the Olympics. But this is swimming so bad luck Thorpe.

I agree Ian Thorpe is a good chance for
Australia
, however if he can't wait for 1 second to go in the water, which is basic--should he race? The answer is no--If he cannot do that Stevens deserves that spot.
 
This just proves the stupidity of Australian selection process. I mean come on. It's a joke! They have the selection on who will represent
Australia in the Olympics based on one race. What if our best athlete was sick, injured or What if some one fluked it? Should we really base it on one race anyway? It should go on who is our best athlete consistently. Australia
should be entitled to watch our best athlete perform in his best event which he is defending champion for and holds the world record. Also it proves what a joke the one start rule is.

Thorpey stuffed up--He knows the rules, he's out. We should get behind Craig Stevens. What's this negativity doing to his
Athens
preparations? If Thorpey races it's not going to change the world, poverty and starving children won't suddenly get better. So let’s get our priorities right and move on!
As much as I'm a fan of Thorpe, I think it's terrible what
Australia is doing to Stevens. He won his heat fair and square and we should be cheering him as a nation not boo hooing him because we think he should step down to let Thorpe have that race. Well done Stevens! Hold your head proud because you deserve it.


Overlooked in the Thorpe controversy is, I believe, the duty of FINA and the IOC to ensure that the paying public, without whose TV licence fees there would be no Olympic Games as we know them today, is given the opportunity to see the best in the world fight it out on the world's best stage. I also hold the opinion that to bow to rules of such unbending pedantry is to deny the enormous respect owed to a defending Olympic champion. It is a unique position, and those who claim otherwise have no concept of his achievement. A few years ago I sat beside Ian Thorpe on a flight from Nice to
London, and he kindly signed a card to my brother who was trailing for the Cambridge University crew in the Boat Race with Oxford. He wrote, "May you live your dreams!" I sincerely hope he will be permitted that basic right himself in Athens.
 
It is disappointing that Thorpey didn't compete, but why should Stevens give up his position after all his hard training and a chance to achieve his Olympic ambition? If Thorpey is meant to compete the opportunity will arise. However, take the pressure of Stevens, he must feel awful about the situation as well; nobody has spoken to him just to find out how he is feeling. Good luck to both of them. It is a great disappointment that this has happened.

Isn't it amazing that in the sporting arena we expect other countries to tow the official line and not make exceptions and then we expect to be allowed to make exceptions to suit ourselves. Yes it is a pity Ian Thorpe was ruled out of the 400m, but he did and still does know the rules under which he competes. Let Craig Stevens have his chance to show his abilities and not blame/condemn him for Ian's inability to stay on the blocks when required to.

 

**UPDATE**(semtember 14)

Ian thorpe is swimming the 400m 




Posted by Lan at Monday, March 29, 2004
Question Reality   





Previous Page
About your Author
Name: Lan
Gender: Female
Location: Australia
(Click to see Profile)





   










<< November 2009 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30





Good Reads:
Astral Awareness
Brain Enema
Just Shades Of Grey
Push
Thunderstorms in the Imajica
Wailfulrhyme
Rocker

Link A Perfect Murder:
Thanks to Push for the great blinky! Vist her and bask in the greatness of her graphics!






I suppose the most obvious question is, how can I trust you?

Bingo. It is a pickle. No doubt about it. The bad news is there's no way if you can really know whether I'm here to help you or not, so it's really up to you. You just have to make up you on damned mind to either accept what I'm going to tell you, or reject it.





Layout© 2004 CHRISTINE

blogdrive





Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth.

What truth?

There is no spoon.

There is no spoon?

Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.





If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:
Contact Me
XML