Previous Entry Next Entry

Sunday, May 15
666--the Number of the Beast...or is it?

Satanists, apocalypse watchers and heavy metal guitarists may have to adjust their demonic numerology after a recently deciphered ancient biblical text revealed that 666 is not the fabled Number of the Beast after all. Instead, a far less menacing 616.

The new piece from the Book of Revelation, written in ancient Greek and dating from the late third century, was  found in a historic dump outside Oxyrhynchus in Egypt.

Ellen Aitken, a professor of early Christian history at McGill University, said the discovery appears to spell the end of 666 as the devil's prime number.
"This is a very nice piece to find," Dr. Aitken said. "Scholars have argued for a long time over this, and it now seems that 616 was the original number of the beast."

The tiny piece of 1,500-year-old papyrus is written in Greek, the original language of the New Testament, and contains a key passage from the Book of Revelation.

Where more conventional versions of the Bible give 666 as the "number of the beast," or the sign of the anti-Christ whose coming is predicted in the book's apocalyptic verses, the older version uses the Greek letters signifying 616.

"This is very early confirmation of that number, earlier than any other text we've found of that passage," Dr. Aitken said. "It's probably about 100 years before any other version."

Elijah Dann, a professor of philosophy and religion at the University of Toronto, said the new number is unlikely to make a dent in the popularity of 666.

"Otherwise, a lot of sermons would have to be changed and a lot of movies rewritten," he said with a laugh. "There's always someone with an active imagination who can put another interpretation on it.

"It just shows you that when you study something as cryptic and mystic as the Book of Revelation there's an almost unlimited number of interpretations."
The book is thought to have been written by the disciple John and according to the King James Bible, the traditional translation of the passage reads: "Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

But Dr. Aitken said that translation was drawn from much later versions of the New Testament than the fragment found in Oxyrhynchus. "When we're talking about the early biblical texts, we're always talking about copies and they are copies made, at best, 150 to 200 years after [the original] was written," she said.

"They can have mistakes in the copying, changes for political or theological reasons ... it's like a detective story piecing it all together."

Dr. Aitken said, however, that scholars now believe the number in question has very little to do the devil. It was actually a complicated numerical riddle in Greek, meant to represent someone's name, she said.

Revelation was actually a thinly disguised political tract, with the names of those being criticized changed to numbers to protect the authors and early Christians from reprisals. "It's a very political document," Dr. Aitken said. "It's a critique of the politics and society of the Roman empire, but it's written in coded language and riddles."

But if 666 isn't the number of the beast, then whose number is it? It wont look very good for heavy metal guitarists if 666 is the number of the tooth fairy.



Posted by Lan at Sunday, May 15, 2005

Static Brain
October 11, 2005   02:40 AM PDT
 
I wonder if that text was gnostic in origin. Gnosticism is pseudo-christianity. It would be interesting to find out.
Jagged
September 9, 2005   01:52 PM PDT
 
Here's an interesting spin: in numerology, one has to reduce the number by adding the numbers in it....eg, 10=1, 34=7, 123=6, etc etc.

616=13, and while I'd usually reduce, I don't reduce the number 13 because it's the sacred number of the Goddess.

I wonder if that has anything to do with it...
beyaz_yalanlar
May 22, 2005   10:08 AM PDT
 
0 1 2 means;

60^0=1
60^1=60
60^2=3600

oh. is my english so bad...? :(
beyaz_yalanlar
May 22, 2005   10:05 AM PDT
 
the ancient Egyptian math was based on a different math than us. We use 10 and its times. But they were using 60 and its times. For example we use 1,10,100,1000,... But they use 1,60,3600,...

So; what were these 60s for?

Do you know something about the planet x? This planet is passing very close to the earth for each 3661 year in our number system. When this planet passes near the earth, it effects all earth's system(like magma, fault systems,...) because its bigger than earth for 3 or 4 times, i couldn't remember.

Let's back to the numbers. Try to write 3661 with ancient Egyptian math technique. it makes;
0 1 2
60 + 60 + 60 = 3661

But the historians made mistake. They knew that Egyptians use 60 system but they apply this system to our system. That means;
0 1 2
60x10 + 60x10 + 60x10 = 666

Because of the bad things which were seen after planet x's visits, might this number(666) known as Satan's number...

Might this be? :) (sorry about my bad english. i hope you could understand. if you couldn't, feel free to visit my blog or e-mail me)

ycanakci@yahoo.com

take care...
LiNeTtE
May 15, 2005   07:54 PM PDT
 
ei,is it true? but eniweiz thanks for letting us know!God Speed!hehe...
  

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments









Previous Entry Next Entry
About your Author
Name: Lan
Gender: Female
Location: Australia
(Click to see Profile)





   










<< May 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31





Good Reads:
Astral Awareness
Brain Enema
Just Shades Of Grey
Push
Thunderstorms in the Imajica
Wailfulrhyme
Rocker

Link A Perfect Murder:
Thanks to Push for the great blinky! Vist her and bask in the greatness of her graphics!






I suppose the most obvious question is, how can I trust you?

Bingo. It is a pickle. No doubt about it. The bad news is there's no way if you can really know whether I'm here to help you or not, so it's really up to you. You just have to make up you on damned mind to either accept what I'm going to tell you, or reject it.





Layout© 2004 CHRISTINE

blogdrive





Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth.

What truth?

There is no spoon.

There is no spoon?

Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.





If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:
Contact Me
XML